Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
Death Dealer: Homage to Frazetta
|
My homage to Frazetta is finally finished and although it has often been
said that a good painting does not need the explanation, I do feel compelled to
say something about one particular aspect of this piece. My intention was not
to make a copy of Frazetta’s character. My intention was to do a homage to the
master by projecting his famous character onto my world and let it go through
the prism of my own vision. The essence of my interpretation has been most
correctly expressed by a good friend of mine and a fellow artist who, upon
seeing the painting, commented: “ Ah,
you are on their side as well…!” Another spot-on remark I heard from another
person was: “This is perhaps the lightest Death Dealer painting I have ever
seen, but still the darkest Death Dealer,
for it appears to me that HE is the bad guy!”
The Death Dealer series, as it is the case with much of Frazetta’s art,
reflect a typical black-and-white approach to the relationship between good and
evil, and it is presented in a simplified and rather straightforward manner. Death
Dealer’s foes are evil savages who are here to be slain (punished for whatever they
stand for), while Death Dealer’s job is to make sure it is properly and
thoroughly done. Generally speaking, I think this aspect of Frazetta’s art is
not only connected to the certain archetypes and the stereotypes of his time,
but it also reflects something of the preconceptions, general aspirations, prevailing ideologies, the
impact of major conflicts, etc. of the 20st century.
The times have changed, as we know . We don’t live anymore in a
black-and-white world (we never did, by the way, this is one of many misconceptions
man has to deal with). We now live in a Grey, more complex world, a global village, where the division
line between the good guys and the bad guys seem to be fairly blurred. In a way
we have become more realistic (I still avoid to use the word “wise” because of
the obvious reasons). It has been said that the most popular character from Peter
Jackson’s movie trilogy The Lord of the
Rings is not Frodo, or Sam, or Gandalf, or Aragorn but Gollum! I think this
is a very interesting indication, although a tiny one, and I guess relatively
insignificant, for there are much better and more relevant examples. Never the
less, this testifies to the shift in the approach of the general public
(popular culture) to the concept of good and bad, which apparently has become
more flexible.
The underlying notion of my Death Dealer interpretation is supposed to
reflect this “new” point of view. The rest of the elements, mostly technical in
nature, are derived from this concept.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Scribbles
Last Saturday I attended a convention in the nearby town of Beverwijk in
North Holland. My publisher Dark Dragon Books presented there a little book
titled Petar Meseldzija Dossier Preview (a
12 pages book, limited to 50 copies only). The book includes a number of recent
sketches and drawings and it is in fact an announcement of a bigger book that will
be published in June this year.
During this rather chilly convention (our booth was quite close to the
entrance and it was a cold day), I did a number of drawings in Dossier Preview book as well as in my Tarzan book. In order to forget about
the cold and to have some extra fun, I decided to do a little game. Most of the sketches, that you can see below, were created in the
following way: I would take a fine liner, close my eyes and do a very quick uncontrolled
scribble, or I would ask the publisher to do the scribble, or my wife. Then I would
let this scribble guide me while I try to “squeeze” a shape out of it, mostly a
head of a grotesque character. None of these characters are premeditated, they
just happened, they popped-up from the scribble J
A scribble and the finished drawing and two regular sketches (below) |
Friday, February 15, 2013
Sketching on bad paper
Here are some
recent sketches from my Tarzan book. The
paper from this book is not very suitable for drawing with graphite because it
is too smooth and plastic-like. Because of that I have to adjust my approach to this disobedient surface (it makes it harder to achieve the usual results), but when after that I do my drawings
on a proper paper, it becomes much easier to control
the drawing process and to achieve the desired results. Sounds quite logical,
right!? So, people, I guess the conclusion is: use bad art materials and tools to
practice with for a certain period of time, in order to enhance your skills :)
Friday, February 8, 2013
Turbulence
A frame from the movie Endrei
Rublev by Andrei Tarkovsky
|
Some of you
have probably noticed that my posts have become short and somewhat meager
lately. One of the main reasons is that, for some time now, my mind has been
tormented by my own present artistic infertility and a feeling that I have lost
my direction, my compass. Well, this is nothing unusual because all of us
experience similar kind of problems at the certain moment in our life. This
often marks a turning point, approaching of the crossroads, a transition from one
stage, or level, to another. Such a situation inevitably creates a certain
amount of turbulence and disorder, since the fundamental and established
thoughts, desires and dreams, that have powered our system and allowed it to be
stable and to function optimally, for a certain reason start to move and shake.
I have
reached the place in my artistic career which I was longing for to arrive at
for many preceding years. This kind of longing of mine does not exists anymore,
it has fulfilled its function by bringing me to the desired spot. No longing,
no motivation. No motivation, no creative vitality. However uncomfortable and
disturbing, this turbulence and the mental pain and disorientation that goes
with it, has forced me to reconsider the very motifs for becoming an artist and
for spending the biggest portion of my life on making art.
As a result
of this struggle I came up with a statement that is supposed to help me find a
new sense of direction and purpose, and therefore revitalize the creative
spirit in me. It is expressed through the following words:
- If my work (art) keeps me from doing a backbreaking physical work, or a
mind numbing monotonous kind of work, and helps me feed myself and my family,
it’s good!
- If it helps
me express my mental and emotional issues, it’s excellent.
- If it helps others to get closer to their own heart, it’s useful.
- If it helps
me get famous and rich, it’s seductive and tricky.
- If it guides me through my inner Dark Forest, helps me slain dragons and
demons, or make them my friends and allies, and shows me the way out of it to a
sunny meadow, it’s wondrous, it fulfills its holy purpose and justifies itself.
One of the
reasons I am revealing this rather intimate issue to you is that I know that
there are many souls out there who are having, or will have in the future, the
same kind of issues with themselves and their art. My confession will not solve
your problem, but it might help a little by showing you that you are not alone
in this struggle, that even the accomplished and “successful” among us have to
deal with these things sooner or later, in one or another way. It might help
you realize thatperhaps you too have to come up with some kind of statement
that will calm down your psyche and help you regain the balance and peace of mind.
As it has always been, the ways of the World are often seductive and
misleading, and there is always a price tag attached to it.
In that
respect, I was delighted to discover that a much bigger artist and a greater
mind than myself has defined art and its purpose in a similar way. Below you
can find out what Andrei Tarkovsky (1932 Zavrazhye, Soviet Union –
1986 Paris, France), one of the greatest Russian movie directors, said about
ART. The films of Andrei Tarkovsky have been revered as ranking on a par with
the masterpieces of Russia's novelists and composers. His work, from films such
as Ivan's Childhood , Andrei Rublev , Solaris, Stalker, has had an enormous influence on the style
of contemporary European film.